Weekly Pressure Report
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026 UTC
Weekly MPS changes · Reconstructed histories included
Premier League
Premier League pressure rankings ↗20 current permanent managers had available match observations in this period; 18 had a comparable pre-week observation. Xabi Alonso had the largest increase among those comparable histories (+16 points). Unai Emery had the largest decrease (−14 points).
18 comparable / 20 observed managers
XA Xabi Alonso
C Chelsea
Why?
MPS rose from 38 to 54 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Brentford (0–3, 18 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+11.7 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
OG Oliver Glasner
NF Nottingham Forest
Why?
MPS rose from 43 to 59 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Coventry City (0–1, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.3 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
SJ Sergej Jakirović
HC Hull City
Why?
MPS rose from 27 to 42 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Newcastle United (1–2, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+11.8 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
UE Unai Emery
AV Aston Villa
Why?
MPS fell from 62 to 48 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a win against Tottenham Hotspur (3–2, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (−13.6 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
La Liga
La Liga pressure rankings ↗20 current permanent managers had available match observations in this period; 18 had a comparable pre-week observation. Manolo González had the largest increase among those comparable histories (+26 points). Beñat San José had the largest decrease (−16 points).
18 comparable / 20 observed managers
MG Manolo González
RE RCD Espanyol
Why?
MPS rose from 41 to 67 across 2 available league-match observations. The last included result was a loss against Elche CF (1–3, 18 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+24.3 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
JA José Alberto López
Rd Racing de Santander
Why?
MPS rose from 45 to 66 across 2 available league-match observations. The last included result was a loss against Celta (0–5, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+15.9 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
QS Quique Sánchez Flores
DA Deportivo Alavés
Verified matches only
Why?
MPS rose from 31 to 47 across 2 available league-match observations. The last included result was a draw against Athletic Club (0–0, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+11.2 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Only directly confirmed matches are included; gaps are not treated as losses. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
BS Beñat San José
RV Rayo Vallecano
Why?
MPS fell from 68 to 52 across 2 available league-match observations. The last included result was a draw against CA Osasuna (1–1, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (−11.7 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
Serie A
Serie A pressure rankings ↗20 current permanent managers had available match observations in this period; 15 had a comparable pre-week observation. Alberto Aquilani had the largest increase among those comparable histories (+18 points). Ivan Jurić had the largest decrease (−15 points).
15 comparable / 20 observed managers
AA Alberto Aquilani
US US Sassuolo
Why?
MPS rose from 30 to 48 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against AC Monza (1–2, 18 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.8 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
KR Kosta Runjaić
UC Udinese Calcio
Why?
MPS rose from 54 to 71 across 2 available league-match observations. The last included result was a loss against Cagliari Calcio (0–1, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+15.5 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
ED Eusebio Di Francesco
UL US Lecce
Why?
MPS rose from 43 to 55 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against AC Milan (0–3, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.2 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
IJ Ivan Jurić
AM AC Monza
Why?
MPS fell from 78 to 63 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a win against US Sassuolo (2–1, 18 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (−11.6 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
Bundesliga
Bundesliga pressure rankings ↗18 current permanent managers had available match observations in this period; 18 had a comparable pre-week observation. Martín Demichelis had the largest increase among those comparable histories (+19 points). Ralf Kettemann had the largest decrease (−18 points).
18 comparable / 18 observed managers
MD Martín Demichelis
RL RB Leipzig
Why?
MPS rose from 36 to 55 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Bayer Leverkusen (0–2, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+13.3 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
MB Manuel Baum
FA FC Augsburg
Why?
MPS rose from 26 to 39 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Werder Bremen (2–3, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.0 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
CI Christian Ilzer
TH TSG Hoffenheim
Why?
MPS rose from 47 to 60 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against SC Paderborn 07 (1–3, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.1 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
RK Ralf Kettemann
SP SC Paderborn 07
Why?
MPS fell from 75 to 57 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a win against TSG Hoffenheim (3–1, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (−13.2 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
Ligue 1
Ligue 1 pressure rankings ↗18 current permanent managers had available match observations in this period; 18 had a comparable pre-week observation. Hugo Oliveira had the largest increase among those comparable histories (+17 points). Will Still had the largest decrease (−17 points).
18 comparable / 18 observed managers
HO Hugo Oliveira
RS RC Strasbourg Alsace
Why?
MPS rose from 33 to 50 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Paris FC (1–2, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+12.5 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
AD Alexandre Dujeux
FL FC Lorient
Why?
MPS rose from 47 to 61 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against Le Mans FC (1–2, 19 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+10.7 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
JL Julien Lachuer
SB Stade Brestois 29
Why?
MPS rose from 49 to 63 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a loss against AJ Auxerre (1–2, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (+9.8 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
WS Will Still
AA AJ Auxerre
Why?
MPS fell from 68 to 51 across 1 available league-match observation. The last included result was a win against Stade Brestois 29 (2–1, 20 Sept 2026). The largest weighted component movement was recent results (−12.9 points before final rounding).
Reconstructed from available results; not a record of a score published on the match date. Same manager, club, tenure and model. MPS is an experimental index, not a dismissal probability.
Share this week
Premier League
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026
La Liga
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026
Serie A
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026
Bundesliga
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026
Ligue 1
14 Sept 2026 – 20 Sept 2026
Citation
Method & sources
Current permanent managers; comparable match observations within each league. Same tenure, model and club-history baseline. Reconstructed scores were not published on the match dates.
MPS is an index, not a dismissal probability. mps-v2.1-experimental.